Friday, October 19, 2012

Bluthering Heights by candlelight


Some people can’t get enough of classic English literature — I attribute that more to Keira Knightley, than to the quality of the books — yet I think even they will grow weary of Wuthering Heights.

Emily Brontë’s book is taught in schools and cherished among literature professors, and you can feel those qualities rattling in its film presentation, which is a dizzying, patience-stretching marathon of boredom lit only by candlelight and scored by the barely audible whispers of its cast.

Much of the movie takes place as characters stare out windows … sigh … pondering. Every now and again the film mixes it up and has them peering through cracked doors, wooden slats or grey-green thistles that whip back and forth in the wind that gasps through the hills of the sprawling estate known as Wuthering Heights. The English farmhouse and surrounding property are draped in dour clouds for the entirety, which does nothing to perk up this collage of gloominess.

The movie begins with Heathcliff, a dark-skinned child who finds himself adopted by a white family, the Earnshaws, in the late 1700s in England. His adoptive father raises him as his own, even baptizing him in a Christian ceremony, which causes resentment from the man’s biological son, Hindley Earnshaw, but not from his daughter, Catherine, who takes a liking to Heathcliff. This is the central relationship in the film, and it grows very stale very quickly. Catherine, of course, loves Heathcliff, but her own hand and the hands of others guide her away from the uneducated boy. Buckle up, romantic tragedy ahead. The first sign of calamity is when the father dies, and cruel Hindley makes Heathcliff a servant.

Halfway through, Heathcliff leaves to go to school and experience the world and comes back to re-discover Catherine to only find that things have grown more complicated. There are children now, in-laws and husbands. And Hindley, who was so abusive to Heathcliff, is a deranged drunk. I kept getting the feeling that the movie was leaving out crucial bits of the book (which I have not read). This alone is fine; not everything can fit into a film. But they did have lots of room to include Heathcliff standing at windows, or of Catherine laying in fields, or of the two of them tumbling down hills. It’s all broth, no meat.

While the film was occasionally evocative and moody, it often went too far. At many points I wanted a better cinematographer on set to light the scenes appropriately. Much of the film is shot in the dark with little to no lighting. Candlelight just doesn’t cut it. Working against the film further are its mumbling actors, who I struggled to hear amid their whispering. Combine these two impairments and Wuthering Heights is a challenge to behold.

Certainly there is a big, dynamic story to take in, but it is often clouded by director Andrea Arnold’s limited vision or budget. Fans of Brontë’s Wuthering Heights will probably adore passages of the film, but I doubt it will live up to their expectations, especially when it’s such a challenge to wrestle through with low-lighting, hard-to-hear dialogue and mindless window pondering.