In case you didn’t know alcoholism was a destructive disease,
here, let me crash a plane to prove a point. It’s like curing cancer by
lighting a hospital on fire — complete and total overkill, not to mention
pointless.
What’s tremendously frustrating about Flight is the high-volume of stellar performances within it.
Consider Denzel Washington, destructive and sympathetic as the seasoned drunk
ravaged by lies, cover-ups and self-deception. He lets alcohol bring him down,
and then cocaine bring him back up. Oddly enough, it’s a symbiotic balance.
He’s joined by big stars (John Goodman, Don Cheadle) and small ones (Kelly
Reilly) as he fights to convince himself he has no problem, even as a crashed
plane sits in a field smoldering.
Officials are blunt about Whip’s abilities: not a single pilot in
a flight simulator could replicate the life-saving outcome of his unorthodox
maneuver. “You saved a lot of lives today,” a transportation official tells
him. Whip finds out later they tested his blood after he was knocked
unconscious in the crash. Of course, they’re going to find alcohol and traces
of marijuana and cocaine. Should he panic, or just play it cool? He dodges the
media and other questions by hiding out at his father’s property, where he
wages an inner battle with himself to quit alcohol cold turkey. On an upswing,
Whip empties all the bottles and cans into the sink, but a liquor store down
the way tempts him further.
Where Flight struggles
is with its many themes, which are so muddled that I failed to grasp the film’s
true intention. Several times it invokes God as part of the plot: the plane
crashes into a church, an evangelical church group rescues some of the
passengers, the co-pilot and his wife are devout believers who believe God
guided the plane to the ground and at one point Whip asks, “Whose God would do
this?” In an earlier scene, in a lengthy monologue, a cancer patient questions
why God would give him such a horrible disease. These scenes, exploratory in
nature, seem disjointed and dangle off the rest of the plot. I kept waiting for
them to link up with the spiritual aspects of Alcoholics Anonymous, but they
never did.
By the end of the film, religion and God really have nothing to
do with anything. All the divine clues from the beginning of the picture were
woeful attempts at misdirection. Really, all Flight is about is how far a person would go to hide their
alcoholism. Smashed, a smaller, more
intimate movie about the exact same thing, went much further and in much more
interesting ways. And it didn’t need to crash a jet to do it. (Go see it, it’s
still in theaters.)
I wanted the film to focus more on this idea of frauds, which it
only vaguely hints at. Whip is an American hero after he guides the plane to
the ground, but he hides a devastating secret — that he was drunk and high
during the crash. At any moment the incriminating facade could crash down and
reveal who he really is. It could be the story of author James Frey, or accused
dopers Barry Bonds or Lance Armstrong. That premise of stolen heroics is more
interesting than anything else suggested in Flight
— other than the performances — though it’s the most downplayed themes.
The movie is directed by Robert Zemeckis, who’s been wandering Uncanny Valley for the last 12 years doing
questionable motion-capture pictures. His action is stunning and utterly
convincing, but everything else wanders with little direction. At one point he
films a scene on the set of a porn movie, with nude actors in the foreground
and background, though the scene serves no purpose. Other times, he just
resorts to trite moralizing and cliché, like during a drug scene when Red Hot
Chili Peppers’ “Under the Bridge” is playing on the soundtrack. Really?! Were
the rights to Jefferson Airplane’s “White Rabbit” not available? Zemeckis’ perception
on R-rated drama — his last 13 films have been PG-13 or milder — is just a
little askew and much of it feels like pandering to adults who know better.
Flight is marvelously
acted, and those airplane sequences look incredible, but all its big pieces
don’t line up in any coherent fashion. It’s as if the cabin, fuselage and tail
were made from three different kinds of planes. It’ll fly, but it’s not very
aerodynamic.